1 Downham Road South, Heswall, Wirral, CH60 5SG
MAN/00CB/LDC/2025/0669 · dispensation from consultation · Wirral · decided 26 Feb 2026
The Tribunal granted the landlord unconditional retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent cleanup and bird proofing works at the property, and refused the leaseholder's requested conditions.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Berkson (Cheshire) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,940 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Flat 1; Flat 2 and Flat 3 are owned by the Applicant
- freeholder
The Applicant is [name] (Cheshire) Limited who brings the application
- outcome
The Tribunal unconditionally grants the Applicant’s application for dispensation under s 20ZA
- total demanded
the Works were carried out between 1 and 3 September 2025 at a cost of £5,940.00 (including VAT)
- s20
The Tribunal unconditionally grants the Applicant’s application for dispensation under s 20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.