1 Angel Hill Court, Angel Hill, Sutton, Surrey, SM1 3EE
LON/00BF/LSC/2024/0825 · service charges · Sutton · decided 6 Nov 2025
The tribunal decided the leaseholder is liable to pay the service charges claimed for 2021 to 2024, rejecting her challenges to the general maintenance costs and management fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Angel Hill Court Management Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HMF Property Co Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,286.57 |
| Total found payable | £3,286.57 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
which is a ground floor flat in a purpose-built block of 6 similarly sized flats
- freeholder
Angel Hill Court Management Company
- agent
Representative : [name], HMF Property Co Ltd
- years
charges for the completed 2021, 2022 and 2023 service charge years
- outcome
It indicated that the service charges of £3,286.57 were payable.
- total demanded
The £6,266.13 comprised £3,286.57 service charges
- total payable
It indicated that the service charges of £3,286.57 were payable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.