1-83 Millacres, Station Road, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 9PU
CAM/26UD/LDC/2025/0704 · dispensation from consultation · East Hertfordshire · decided 28 Apr 2026
The tribunal dispensed with the statutory consultation requirements for the cladding and balcony works at Millacres, subject to the applicant giving the leaseholders written information on how the works have been paid for or when they may be charged, and refused the request for a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Granary Mansions Management Limited |
| Management company | Amber Estate Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 82 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
therefore there are 82 flats in total
- freeholder
the landlord, Granary Mansions Management Limited
- outcome
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the cladding project
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20 C of the 1985 Act
- s20
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the cladding project
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.