Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BB2 4GY

1-80 Hollin Bank Court Blackburn BB2 4GY

MAN/00BY/LSC/2017/0099 · service charges · Blackburn with Darwen · decided 17 May 2024

The tribunal found the insurance premiums for 2021 to 2023 were not reasonably incurred and allowed a lower gross premium, so the leaseholder pays a reduced insurance rent of £175.00, £187.50 and £206.25 per flat for those years, with the s.20C application to be decided later on written submissions.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not clear
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordRMB 102 Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 80 flats
Service charge years in dispute2021, 2022, 2023
Items in disputeinsurance
Items disallowed or reducedinsurance
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
the Property comprises 80 residential flats contained within two four-storey blocks
freeholder
Respondent : RMB 102 Ltd
years
The Applicant is liable to pay the Respondent the amounts of £175.00, £187.50 and £206.25 per flat in respect of the insurance rent for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 service charge years.
outcome
we find the reasonable sum allowable for the gross premium to be as follows: - 2021 - £14,000
items reduced
Tribunal finds it perplexing that despite [name]

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.