1-57 Oakcroft Court Hemel Hempstead Herts HP3 9EU
CAM/26UC/LDC/2026/0014 · dispensation from consultation · Dacorum · decided 30 Apr 2026
The tribunal granted the freeholder dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at the block, on terms that leave the cost and reasonableness of the works open to later challenge by leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Collinson Hall Ltd |
| Building | A block, 57 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to meet its own costs of the application |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property consists of several purpose built flats, 1-57
- agent
Representative : Collinson Hall Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.