1-5 New Street, Hinckley, Leicester, Leicestershire LE9 7FS
BIR/31UE/LDC/2019/0001 · dispensation from consultation · Hinckley and Bosworth · decided 16 Apr 2019
The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the rotten main floor of the block, because delay would risk further damage and danger.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | 1-5 New Street Earl Shilton Management Company |
| Managing agent | Bradgate Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
12 self-contained flats originally converted from a shoe factory
- management company
1-5 New Street Earl Shilton Management
- agent
the Applicant, through its Managing Agents, Bradgate Property Management Limited, applied to the Tribunal
- outcome
Accordingly, the Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA
- s20
Accordingly, the Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.