1-47 Stevenson Crescent, London SE16 3EN

LON/00BE/LSC/2018/0400 · service charges · Southwark · decided 3 Jun 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found most of the service charges for 2010/11 to 2018/19 reasonable and payable, reduced or disallowed several specific items in 2014/15 to 2017/18, limited the landlord's recoverable costs of the application to 90%, and ordered a 50% refund of the application and hearing fees.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Hyde Housing Association Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	An estate, 12 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2010, 2011
Items in dispute	cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance
Total demanded	£137,800.70
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to refund the applicants £150 representing 50% of the application and hearing fees

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder: Hyde Housing Association Ltd
years: The service charges for 2010/11 are reasonable and payable by the
outcome: The tribunal reduces item 67 on the [name]
items reduced: The tribunal disallows item 56 on the [name] in the sum of ££113.64 for key replacement
total demanded: The Applicants asserted that the sum of £137,800.70 was in dispute.
s20c: The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and limits the Respondent to 90% of its costs
costs: The Respondent is to refund the Applicants £150 representing 50% of the application and hearing fees.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.