1-37 Aqua House, Agate Close, London, NW10 7FF
LON/00AC/LDC/2024/0081 · dispensation from consultation · Brent · decided 30 Jul 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the automatic opening ventilation system at Aqua House, leaving any question of cost reasonableness or payability to be decided later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | First Central Residents Management Co Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Trinity Estates |
| Building | A block, 37 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
37 flats within a high-rise development
- freeholder
First Central Residents Management Co Ltd
- agent
Representative : Trinity Estates
- outcome
The tribunal grants dispensation under section 20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The tribunal grants dispensation under section 20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Service Charges (Consultation) (England) 2003 for the works set out in the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.