1-36 Cedar Court, Lower Street, Haslemere, Surrey, GU27 2BA
HAV/43UL/LDC/2025/0707 · dispensation from consultation · Waverley · decided 25 Feb 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for roof works only, subject to conditions on estimates, costs and sending out the decision, and made a section 20C order protecting three objecting leaseholders from proceedings costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hasle Court Estate Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Merlin Estates Limited |
| Building | An estate, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | applicant bears its own costs of the proceedings and may not recover them from leaseholders |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
relevant contribution for costs to exceed £250 for each of the 36 leaseholders.
- freeholder
Applicant : Hasle Court Estate Limited
- agent
Representative : Merlin Estates Limited
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20c
None of the management or legal costs of these Tribunal proceedings shall be relevant costs for the purpose of calculating service charges payable by KB Holdings
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- costs
the Applicant does not seek to recover from any of the leaseholders by way of service charge or otherwise
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.