1-36 Amberry Court, Harlow, Essex CM20 2PX
CAM/22UJ/LSC/2023/0055 · service charges · Harlow · decided 27 Aug 2025
The tribunal decided that no service charge refunds for 2023/2024 are due to the leaseholders as claimed, because the credits are not payable back as cash, and it refused the section 20C application.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Can Prop Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, major works |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Amberry Court comprises 36 flats across three blocks
- freeholder
the freeholder is Can Prop Limited
- agent
the current managing agent Woodward Property Management Company
- years
the service charge year 2023/2024
- outcome
there are no refunds of service charges due to be paid to the Applicant
- items reduced
no service charge was payable in respect of those planned works
- s20c
The application for an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is refused.
- s20
it had been conceded that a valid process had not been followed
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.