1-33 Brooklyn Court, High Road, Loughton, Essex, IG10 1AQ
CAM/22UH/LSC/2018/0066 · service charges · Epping Forest · decided 12 Feb 2019
The defendant stopped disputing the service charges claimed, and the Tribunal ordered it to pay the claimant's costs of the Tribunal proceedings since 2 November 2018 and reimburse the fees paid.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Metropolitan & City Properties (Loughton) Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £17,890.57 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's costs since 2 November 2018 and reimburse the tribunal fees paid since that date |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Claimant : Metropolitan & City Properties (Loughton) Ltd
- years
accounting years 2015 (£4,015.53), 2016 (£7,256.27), and 2017 (£6,618.77)
- outcome
The parties agreed that the sole issue for the court was the costs of the Tribunal proceedings.
- total demanded
formally admitted that £17,890.57 had been demanded and remained unpaid
- costs
requiring the defendant to reimburse to the claimant the whole of the fees paid
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.