1-30 Bridge Court Bridge Road Grays, Essex RM17 6BW
CAM/00KG/LDC/2023/0048 · dispensation from consultation · Thurrock · decided 6 Dec 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord's application to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the walkways at the front of the north and south blocks, as no leaseholder opposed it.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Bridge Court (Grays) RTM Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Griffin Residential Block Management |
| Building | A block, 30 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the property consists of a purpose-built residential block of 30 units
- freeholder
on behalf of the landlord, Bridge Court (Grays) RTM Company Limited
- agent
The application is made by Griffin Residential Block Management on behalf of the landlord
- outcome
to dispense with the consultation requirements in respect of qualifying works
- s20
to dispense with the consultation requirements in respect of qualifying works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.