Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near HP11 2NH

1 – 26 Mahoney Court, Oakridge Road, High Wycombe, Bucks HP11 2NH

CAM/11UF/LDC/2019/0025 · dispensation from consultation · Buckinghamshire · decided 5 Nov 2019

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent rewiring and emergency lighting works at Mahoney Court, finding the leaseholders were not significantly prejudiced.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 26 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£13,323.36
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
The Property is a two-storey block of 26 self-contained flats
outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with all the consultation requirements referred to in section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
total demanded
The total cost of the work including VAT was estimated to be £13,323.36.
s20
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable to dispense with all the consultation requirements referred to in section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.