1-26 Davoll Court, Marine Street, Bermondsey, London SE16 4RJ
LON/00BE/LSC/2025/1074 · service charges · Southwark · decided 4 Mar 2026
The tribunal found that the landlord's method of apportioning increased insurance premiums between the building's two parts (40.5% basic and 88.6% uplifted) was reasonable and in accordance with the lease, and made no section 20C order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Hyde Housing Association Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 26 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a block of 26 flats
- years
the insurance for the years 2021/2022, 2022/2023 and 2023/2024
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the method of apportionment of the insurance premiums used by [name] Youth Centre is reasonable and in accordance with the lease.
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.