1-25 The Carriages, Station Approach, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 9PL
CAM/26UD/LDC/2025/0696 · dispensation from consultation · East Hertfordshire · decided 7 Apr 2026
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent emergency works to replace water pumps at the building, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the actual costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sandhill Homes Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £7,015.20 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
appointed by Sandhill Homes Ltd, the Landlord of the Property
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable for the Applicant to dispense with the consultation requirements in relation to the works
- total demanded
an invoice from Direct Pumps Services Ltd in the sum of £7,015.20
- s20
The Tribunal determines that it is reasonable for the Applicant to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.