1 – 24 Holmes Court, Lynley Close, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 9GA
CHI/29UH/LDC/2023/0141 · dispensation from consultation · Maidstone · decided 20 Dec 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation on terms from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent repairs to a retaining wall, reducing the notice period to 5 days and allowing one estimate for the ground anchor work and separate estimates for other elements.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Perimeter Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a purpose built block of 11 flats.
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder of the Property.
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation on terms under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation on terms under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.