1-24 Armsby House, Stepney Way, London E1 3BQ
LON/00BG/LDC/2025/0893 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 11 Dec 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for intrusive structural testing of 18 concrete balconies, but refused dispensation for any urgent temporary safety works identified after testing.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 1-24 Armsby House Freehold Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : 1-24 Armsby House Freehold Ltd
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements not already complied with in respect of the qualifying works comprising intrusive structural testing of 18 concrete balconies
- s20
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements not already complied with in respect of the qualifying works comprising intrusive structural testing of 18 concrete balconies
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.