1-20 St Peters Place, Lower Bristol Road, Bath, BA2 3EP
CHI/00HA/LVL/2019/0002 · variation of lease · Bath and North East Somerset · decided 15 Aug 2019
The tribunal ordered the variation of the leases of the 20 flats at St Peter's Place so that service charge percentages totalling less than 100% are corrected pro rata, by the applicant's proposed method.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Aviva Investors Ground Rent Holdco Ltd & Aviva Investors Ground Rent GP Ltd |
| Management company | St Peter's Place Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into a block of 20 residential flats
- freeholder
2) [name] Ground Rent Holdco Ltd & [name] Ground Rent GP Ltd (The Freeholder)
- management company
Applicant : St Peter’s Place Management Company Limited
- outcome
the leases of 1-20 St Peter’s Place, Lower Bristol Road, Bath BA2 3EP (“the Property”) shall be varied in the form set out in the Schedule annexed hereto.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.