1-20 Haverhill Garages, Bumpstead Road, Haverhill, Suffolk CB9 8QD
CAM/42UF/LDC/2021/0055 · dispensation from consultation · West Suffolk · decided 17 Mar 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation under section 20ZA from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to refurbish 20 garages and repair their roofs, while leaving the reasonableness and payability of the costs open.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Gem Estate Management Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
The application is made by Gem Estate Management Limited on behalf of the landlord, [name].
- outcome
The tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to dispense with the consultation requirements in respect of qualifying works to refurbish the 20 garages and repair their roofs.
- s20
The tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements in relation to works required to repair the garages and return them to use.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.