1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 Hillgrove Court, Mill Street, Kidderminster, DY11 6XD
BIR/47UG/LSC/2022/0005 · service charges · Wyre Forest · decided 5 Jan 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the insurance premium charged for 2022, of £249.54 per apartment, reasonable and payable, and made an order that the landlord's litigation costs cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising three commercial, and six residential properties
- freeholder
Respondent : R & D Aggregates Ltd t/a R & D
- years
in respect of insurance premium for the service charge year 2022
- outcome
is reasonable and payable by the Applicants in relation to Apartments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
- s20c
Pursuant to section 20C of the 1985 Act the Tribunal Orders that none of the costs incurred
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.