1-12 Parkchurch House, 108 Grosvenor Avenue, N5 2NE
LON/00AU/LDC/2022/0049 · dispensation from consultation · Islington · decided 26 Jul 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to remedy a roof leak causing water penetration in flat 11 at Parkchurch House, as no leaseholder would be prejudiced.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Residential Management Group Limited |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,740 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 12 units with pitched and tiled main roofs
- agent
A written application was made by Residential Management Group Limited, the managing agents of the property.
- outcome
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA
- total demanded
estimates for works totalling £4,740 including VAT
- s20
The tribunal exercises its discretion to grant dispensation from the consultation requirements of s20ZA
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.