1-12 Clarendon Court, Kingsbury Street, Marlborough, Wiltshire, SN8 1EJ
CHI/00HY/LDC/2019/0083 · dispensation from consultation · Wiltshire · decided 21 Nov 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for a monitoring programme of the leaning and bulging brick walls at Clarendon Court, without deciding whether any service charge costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Kingsbury Hill Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Pinnacle Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
1-12 Clarendon Court, Kingsbury Street,
- management company
Applicant : Kingsbury Hill Management Company
- agent
Representative : Pinnacle Property Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all or any of the
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from all or any of the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the work to monitor the condition of the walls
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.