1-12 Balmoral Court, 1-6 Blenheim Court, 1-8 Glamis Court, 1-6 Clarence Court and 1-6 Sandringham Court High Wycombe Buckinghamshire HP13 6LX
· other · Buckinghamshire · decided 6 May 2022
The tribunal struck out the application for an order requiring the landlord to nominate another insurer, because the leases required the management company rather than the leaseholders to insure, so paragraph 8 of the 1985 Act did not apply, and it made no costs-protection order.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Firstgate Residents Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 38 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property accommodates 38 leasehold flats
- management company
2. Firstgate Residents Management Limited
- outcome
The application under paragraph 8 of the Schedule to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the “1985 Act”) is hereby struck out
- s20c
The tribunal makes no order under section 20C of the 1985 Act or paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.