1 – 12 and 14 – 37, Birches Rise, High Wycombe, Bucks HP12 3AQ
CAM/11UF/LSC/2022/0062 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 21 Mar 2023
The tribunal decided that the lease allows the applicant management company to recover the costs of installing a door entry phone system and lock through the service charge, at a price to be determined after the section 20 consultation process.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Chiltern Gardens Management Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 36 flats in the 6 blocks.
- management company
This application was made by Chiltern Gardens Management Limited, (CGM) which is the management company for the development
- outcome
The tribunal makes the determination set out below agreeing that the costs of the installation of a suitable door entry phone and door lock are matters for which a service charge can be recovered by the Applicant, subject as provided for below.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.