1-111 Husdon House, Station Approach, Epsom, Surrey KT19 8DL
HAV/43UC/LDC/2026/0028 · dispensation from consultation · Epsom and Ewell · decided 10 May 2026
The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for an urgent temporary fire alarm system installation at Hudson House, subject to the decision being served on leaseholders and posted on the website and in the communal areas.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Station Approach (Epsom) Management Company Limited |
| Management company | Station Approach (Epsom) Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 111 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Hudson House is a block of 111 flats
- freeholder
[name] (Epsom) Management Company Limited dated 16 February 2026
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.