1-10 Badminton Court,London, N4 1SH
LON/00AM/LDC/2025/0802 · dispensation from consultation · Hackney · decided 4 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted the council's retrospective application to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements for urgent remediation works, including underpinning and structural repairs, at the block, while making no finding that the cost or scope of the works is reasonable and leaving the leaseholder free to challenge actual costs under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It comprises 10 units, with one being a leasehold property and the other nine
- outcome
The Tribunal granted the application for the following main reasons:
- s20
The Tribunal, therefore, concluded that the Respondent was not being prejudiced by the Applicant’s failure to consult, and the application was granted as sought.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.